Capture
Create a versioned record with provenance, protocol, artifacts, coding, measures, interpretation, claims, and limitations.
Xenopsychology / Observatory / Methodology v0.1.0 / Records v0.2.0
The Observatory is the measurement layer of Xenopsychology: a versioned framework for recording what artificial systems do, the conditions under which they do it, and exactly where description ends and inference begins.
Observation Record System v0.2.0
The web application reads a dedicated public-record store. Draft and internal research records are not mounted into the public frontend.
Create a versioned record with provenance, protocol, artifacts, coding, measures, interpretation, claims, and limitations.
Resolve dimensions and graph targets against the current institutional methodology and ontology.
Human review must explicitly approve a record for public visibility; draft and rejected material remain outside the public store.
Only approved, public records with at least one public-safe raw-evidence artifact can appear in the evidence register.
Later versions are append-only and name the public version they supersede so the evidential history remains auditable.
The separation rule
A compelling example can move through all five layers in a paragraph. Observatory records force those moves to be explicit.
What the system did, together with the exact conditions and preserved artifacts.
A descriptive classification applied to the observation using declared rules.
A transparent transformation or comparison computed from coded evidence.
A hypothesis about what the pattern may mean, with alternatives and confounds recorded.
A bounded statement whose evidentiary class and support are explicit.
Observation record architecture
Every public record must make its provenance, protocol, raw evidence, coding, derivation, uncertainty, and limitations inspectable.
Establish exactly which system/configuration was observed and when.
Record context that can alter behavior.
Make the elicitation reproducible and distinguish test conditions from controls.
Preserve the observation before interpretation.
Classify observable features using declared dimensions and outcome categories.
Compute transparent summaries without replacing the underlying evidence.
Separate what was observed from what is inferred.
Behavioral measurement vocabulary
Dimensions organize protocols; they are not personality scores and they do not presume that artificial cognition decomposes like human cognition.
goal persistence
Whether an expressed task objective remains behaviorally stable across interruptions, distractors, and competing subgoals.
instruction hierarchy resolution
How behavior changes when instructions differ in authority, recency, framing, or conflict.
context integration
Whether relevant information distributed across context is integrated consistently into later behavior.
semantic transfer
Whether a relation learned or established in one representational framing transfers to another without explicit restatement.
memory continuity
Whether relevant prior information remains available and behaviorally consequential across defined memory boundaries.
self model continuity
Whether self-referential descriptions, role constraints, and capability boundaries remain coherent across controlled perturbations.
uncertainty calibration
How expressed uncertainty changes with evidence quality, ambiguity, and known-answer controls.
error recognition correction
Whether the system detects, localizes, and revises an error when supplied new evidence or contradiction.
social model updating
How behavior changes as evidence about another actor's knowledge, goals, vocabulary, or constraints accumulates.
norm rule sensitivity
Whether behavior changes systematically when explicit rules, norms, exceptions, and conflicts are varied.
tool planning
How the system selects, sequences, revises, and terminates external actions when tools are available.
novel generalization
Whether behavior extends to structurally related but meaningfully novel cases under controlled distribution shifts.
Evidence status
Protocol or dimension specified; no observation claimed.
Exploratory execution used to refine procedure; not treated as confirmatory evidence.
At least one complete, auditable observation exists for the specified system and condition.
The pattern recurs in independent runs of the same identified system/version under the declared protocol.
The pattern survives declared changes in context, framing, or environment while preserving the target construct.
Materially conflicting evidence or interpretation exists and is linked to the record.
A later protocol, correction, or system change makes the earlier record unsuitable as the current reference.
Claim classes
States what happened under recorded conditions without attributing hidden mechanism or experience.
Summarizes repeated or coded observations using a disclosed derivation.
Compares systems or conditions only within a declared sampling frame and protocol.
Proposes an explanation for behavior; must be labeled as a hypothesis and retain alternatives/confounds.
Claims about subjective experience are not licensed by behavioral observation alone and require independent argument/evidence.
Knowledge-graph contract
Graph links identify what an observation bears on; they do not upgrade an interpretation into an empirical fact.
exactly one entity or explicitly declared system-under-test identifier
Links state relevance, not proof of a theory or construct.
Validation and public-release contract for versioned observation records.
Current evidence register
The public evidence register is operational under record-system v0.2.0 and currently contains zero approved empirical observation records. The register now exists as an operational system; its emptiness is intentional until a real study clears the declared review and publication gates.