Skip to page content
XENOPSYCHOLOGYMINDS BEYOND OUR OWN

INSIGHTS · CONCEPTUAL WORKING PAPERS

Ideas for minds
unlike our own.

Xenopsychology is being built through careful definitions, comparative thought experiments, and eventually empirical work. Start with a clearly labeled abstract, then continue to the full research paper online or as a PDF.

WHY PUBLISH NOW

A new discipline should show its reasoning in public.

Xenopsychology is new. That makes transparency more important, not less. We separate cultural thought experiments from empirical claims, mark working concepts as provisional, and revise language when better evidence arrives.

Insights connects cultural thought experiments with precise questions about artificial cognition. Each piece develops an argument, states its limits, identifies its sources, and proposes a way to test the question.

ABSTRACT · FOUNDATIONAL PAPER

THE FOUNDING ARGUMENT

The Artificial Mind Is Not an Artificial Human

A practical framework for studying artificial systems without mistaking human resemblance—or a software label—for an explanation.

Human Baseline FallacyArtificial MindCognitive EcologyCross-Cognitive Probe
Read abstract

CULTURAL CASE STUDIES

Humanity rehearsed the problem in fiction before we could study it in machines.

These are interpretive thought experiments—not empirical evidence about AI. Their value is that they isolate problems of communication, identity, instruction, and cognitive difference with unusual clarity.

FROM THOUGHT EXPERIMENT TO METHOD

Fiction can sharpen a question.
Science must test it.

A cultural case study can reveal a conceptual problem. It cannot establish how current AI systems actually behave. The next step is operationalization: define the construct, create a probe, vary the context, compare systems, replicate, and publish the limits.

Explore the scientific framework

BUILDING THE DISCIPLINE

Define the terms. Expose the assumptions.
Turn the questions into measurements.

Seven full-length conceptual working papers, each with its own abstract, references, worked examples, and proposed studies. These manuscripts are not peer reviewed; the proposed evaluations have not been conducted.