Skip to page content
XENOPSYCHOLOGYMINDS BEYOND OUR OWN

Xenopsychology / Institutional Knowledge Map

A field becomes legible when its concepts connect.

This map links the current Xenopsychology vocabulary, conceptual working papers, and case-study anchors without collapsing them into a single theory of mind.

6research domains
25Lexicon concepts
7working papers
7case-study anchors
124declared relationships

Foundations & Scope

4 concepts

What is being studied, where the system boundary sits, and why non-human cognition needs its own descriptive discipline.

Difference & Measurement

6 concepts

How cognitive difference can be compared, perturbed, and measured without treating the human mind as the universal baseline.

Communication & Semantics

4 concepts

How usable meaning can cross between intelligences whose representations, assumptions, or channels differ.

Identity & Continuity

5 concepts

How persistence, memory, role, personality-like behavior, and continuity can be described without prematurely settling personhood.

Ecology & Behavior

4 concepts

How behavior changes within informational, technical, social, and institutional environments.

Interpretation & Inference

2 concepts

How observers can distinguish evidence from anthropomorphic projection, explanatory overreach, and unsupported internal-state claims.

Concept relationship view

Cognitive Distance

Open source →

The degree and structure of difference between two intelligences across relevant cognitive dimensions such as learning history, representation, embodiment, temporal processing, motivation, memory, or communication.

Published working papers

Paper-to-concept edges come directly from the paper keyword metadata.

Working paper · not peer reviewed

The Artificial Mind Is Not an Artificial Human

Implementation, behavior, and subjective experience are different questions. A useful science states which one it is investigating and what evidence could change its answer.

Read full paper →

Case-study anchors

Fictional examples are explicitly labeled; they organize questions rather than supply empirical evidence.